The exhibition Living the City tells over fifty stories from architecture, art, and city planning projects in the main hall of the former Berlin-Tempelhof Airport. The National Urban Development Policy exhibition runs from 25th September until 20th December 2020 and shows processes and opportunities for action in cities across Europe.
[tttgallery id=”906″ template=”content-slider”]
Cities are full of stories — simultaneous, contradictory, overlapping, and inextricably connected. For three months, the former airport will be transformed into a venue for city life. In a walk-through urban collage, visitors will encounter a range of stories from people and projects that are actively involved in the city and civic society.
[tttgallery id=”907″ template=”content-slider”]
These stories ask questions concerning fundamental activities like loving, living, making, participating, learning, playing, moving, and dreaming in the city. These are stories that shape and transform, that make you feel and think. Furthermore, a wide-ranging event and education program invites everyone to actively participate and contribute.
For more information click here.
Bibliography of the following articles:
p. 26
Mannigfaltig, kosmopolitisch, schön
Prof. Dr. Sören Schöbel, TU Munich
- Wolfgang Haber: Landwirtschaft und Naturschutz, 2014, S. 57
- Immanuel Kant: Kritik der reinen Vernunft, 1781
- ders.: Idee zu einer allgemeinen Geschichte in weltbürgerlicher Absicht, 1784
- SenUVK: Basisbericht Umweltgerechtigkeit. Grundlagen für die sozialräumliche Umweltpolitik, 2019
- dies.: Charta für das Berliner Stadtgrün, Entwurf und Handlungsprogramm, 2019
- Wagner, Martin: Das sanitäre Grün der Städte, 1915
- Wenzel, Jürgen: Peter Joseph Lenné – Stadtplaner in weltbürgerlicher Absicht, in: Buttlar, Peter Joseph: Lenné – Volkspark und Arkadien, 1989, S. 69- 81
p. 54
Vielfalt fördern
Prof. Dr. Constanze A. Petrow
- Clare Rishbeth (2001): Ethnic Minority Groups and the Design of Public Open Space: An Inclusive Landscape? Landscape Research Bd. 26 Nr. 4, 351–366
- Jonathan Daly (2019): Superkilen: Exploring the Human-nonhuman Relations of Intercultural Encounter. Journal of Urban Design, https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2019.1622409
- Stadt Wien (2006): Integration im öffentlichen Raum. Werkstattberichte Nr. 82, Wien
- Anastasia Loukaitou-Sideris (1995): Urban Form and Social Context: Cultural Differentiation in the Uses of Urban Parks. Journal of Planning Education and Research, Nr. 14, 89–102
- Setha Low, Dana Taplin, Suzanne Scheld (2005): Rethinking Urban Parks. Public Space and Cultural Diversity. Austin
p. 60
Stadtgrün im (Klima)Wandel
Prof. Dr. Norbert Kühn
- Balder, H., Ehlebracht, K & Mahler, E., 1997: Strassenbäume: Planen – Pflanzen – Pflegen am Beispiel Berlin. Berlin: Patzer
- Bergmann, J., et al., 2010: The Iberian Peninsula as a potential source for the plant species pool in Germany under projected climate change. Plant Ecol 207, 191–201
- BMEL (Hrsg.), 2020: Ergebnisse der Waldzustandserhebung 2019. Bonn
- Böll, S., Albrecht, R. & Mahsberg, D., 2019: Stadtklimabäume – geeignete Habitate für die urbane Insektenvielfalt? LWG aktuell, 3-11
- Böll, S.; Schönfeld, P. & Körber, K., 2014: Stadtbäume im Zeichen des Klimawandels. In: Dujesiefken, D. (Hrsg.): Jahrbuch der Baumpflege 2014. Braunschweig: Haymarket, 155–170
- Brüggemann, N, Butterbach-Bahl, K., 2017: Biogeochemische Stoffkreisläufe. In: Brasseur, G. P., Jacob, D., & Schuck-Zöller, S.: Klimawandel in Deutschland. Berlin: Springer, 173-181
- Filewod, B., Thomas, S. C., 2014: Impacts of a spring heat wave on canopy processes in a northern hardwood forest. Global change biology 20(2), 360-371
- Holling, C. S., Gunderson, L. H., 2002: Resilience and adaptive cycles. In: Gunderson, L. H. (Hrsg.), Panarchy. Washington: Island press., 25-62
- IPCC 2018: Summary for Policymakers of IPCC Special Report on Global Warming of 1.5°C approved by governments (Post). https://www.ipcc.ch/2018/10/08/summary-for-policymakers-of-ipcc-special-report-on-global-warming-of-1-5c-approved-by-governments/ am 29.08.2019
- Kornhuber, K. et al., 2019: Extreme weather events in early summer 2018 connected by a recurrent hemispheric wave-7 pattern. Environmental Research Letters 14(5), 054002
- Liesebach, M., 2017: Eigenanzucht vs. Fremdanzucht von Gehölzen für historische Gärten im Klimawandel. In: In: Kühn et al. (Hrsg.)., Gehölze in historischen Gärten im Klimawandel. TU Berlin, Landschaftsentwicklung und Umweltplanung 131: 241-246
- Manion, P D., 1981: Tree disease concepts. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall
- Marx, A. et al., 2019: Climate Change as Driver for Ecosystem Services Risk and Opportunities. In: Schröter et al., Atlas of Ecosystem Services. Berlin: Springer, 173-178
- Pretzsch, H. et al., 2017: Climate change accelerates growth of urban trees in metropolises worldwide. Scientific Reports 7(1), 1-10
- Rabitsch W., Essl F., Beierkuhnlein C. & Jentsch A., 2013: Klima als Umwelt- und Überlebensfaktor. In: Essl F., Rabitsch W. (eds), Biodiversität und Klimawandel. Berlin: Springer, 30-49
- Roloff, A., Gillner, S. & Korn, S., 2008: Gehölzartenwahl im urbanen Raum unter dem Aspekt des Klimawandels. Sonderausgabe Grün ist Leben, 30-42
- Roloff, Andreas (2013): Bäume in der Stadt. Stuttgart: Ulmer
- Rose, L. et al., 2009: Are marginal beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) provenances a source for drought tolerant ecotypes? European Journal of Forest Research 128(4), 335-343
- Schönfeld, P., 2018: Welche Bäume sind zukunftsfähig. Pro Baum 03/2018: 2-9
- SenStadtUm (Hrsg.), 2013: Pflanzen für Berlin. Verwendung gebietseigener Herkünfte. Berlin, Kulturbuch
- Sjöman, H. et al., 2016: Diversification of the urban forest – can we afford to exclude exotic tree species? Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 18, 237-241
- Teskey, R. et al., 2015: Responses of tree species to heat waves and extreme heat events. Plant, cell & environment 38(9), 1699-1712
- Tomczyk, A. M., Bednorz, E., 2019: Heat waves in Central Europe and tropospheric anomalies of temperature and geopotential heights. International Journal of Climatology 39(11), 4189-4205
- von der Lippe, M. & Kowarik, I. (2014): Warum weiter mit dem Originalbaum? In: Wecke, C. & Weber, K. (Hrsg.): Wiedergeburt von Baumgiganten. Berlin: be.bra, 49–60
p. 90
Gerechte Zukunft für die Stadt
Dr. Henrike Knappe
- Talja Blokland, Vojin Šerbedžija: Gewohnt ist nicht normal: Jugendalltag in zwei Kreuzberger Kiezen. Logos Verlag, Berlin 018
- Christa Böhme, Arno Bunzel: Umweltgerechtigkeit im städtischen Raum: Expertise „Instrumente zur Erhaltung und Schaffung von Umweltgerechtigkeit“. DIFU 2014
- Elizabeth Dirth: Handreichung zur Zukunftsgestaltung: Ein Instrumentarium für die Reaktion auf Friday for Furture https://www.iass-potsdam.de/de/ergebnisse/publikationen, Institut für transformative Nachhaltigkeitsforschung, 2019
- Maarten A. Hajer, Ton Dassen, T. (eds.): Smart about cities: Visualising the challenge for 21st century urbanism. Nai010 Publishers, Rotterdam 2014
- Patrizia Nanz, Claus Leggewie: Die Konsultative: Mehr Demokratie durch Bürgerbeteiligung, Wagenbach 2016
The creative use of space, objects and time is a hallmark of Christo, who passed away on May 31, 2020. Together with his partner Jean-Claude, he evolved the idea of wrapping objects, buildings, and landscapes, transforming them into an art form. Our author Wolfram Höfer, Associate Professor and Chair of the Department of Landscape Architecture at Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, reflects on his personal encounters with Christo’s art. A personal farewell.
[tttgallery id=”869″]
For me, as a landscape architect, Christo’s and Jeanne-Claude’s art is important because it forced the viewer to see places and landforms differently – and so to discover new qualities. My first personal encounter with their work was the “Wrapped Reichstag” in Berlin in 1995. I had just graduated from college and was working as a landscape planner. Their “Project for Berlin” became my summer event. Christo and Jeanne-Claude transformed the not very architecturally exciting Reichstag building (Wilhelm II-style: over-decorated, clumsy, fat, loaded with a lot of bad German history) into an aesthetically exciting object and created a completely new space. It was fascinating to see how thousands of people were enjoying it every day: examining, discussing, arguing. To me, Christo’s art often shows a witty (and wise) sense of humor that seemed to shine through from under the veil of cloth.
“The perception of the building in Berlin’s urban space has been sustainably changed by Christo”
Today, the “Wrapped Reichstag” is history and the building again serves its original purpose as Germany’s parliament. But since then, the perception of the building in Berlin’s urban space has been sustainably changed by Christo. His veiling was a revelation for many, taking away part of the building’s historic encumbrance and creating unforgettable images.
In 1999 and in 2013 I had the opportunity to see Christo’s installations at the Gasometer in Oberhausen. During both projects, his playful dealing with space and scale were remarkable and memorable. The 1999 “Wall of Oil Barrels” and the 2013 “Big Air Package” delivered a sublime perception of three-dimensional space inside this former industrial building. Christo’s and Jeanne-Claude’s installation made it possible to experience what “absolutely great” really feels like. As a footnote – these two projects were their only land-art installations inside an exhibition venue. On all other occasions the artist couple only used exhibition spaces to present objects from the preparation of their projects – these objects pointed at the final ‘product’, but did not physically show it.
“I was blown away by the beauty and spatial experience.”
In 2005, when I walked the “Gates” project in New York City’s Central Park, I just loved their work (as before in Berlin and Oberhausen). I was flirting with the idea of moving to the U.S. and was blown away by the beauty and spatial experience moving through their perfectly placed orange gates and the shiny orange fabric. The paths they chose for the “Gates” modeled a landscape out of Central Park in wintery light that was beautifully sublime. It created a joyful walking experience and cast Central Park in a completely different light. Today, another layer of appreciation adds to my relationship to Christo’s and Jeanne-Claude’s oeuvre. After 15 years of working in the tristate area surrounding New York City (NYC), I now see a new dimension of their art: making projects become reality. Bureaucracy is a global phenomenon, but in this respect as in many others, NYC is exceptional: political minefields and trench warfare render decision making a debilitatingly slow snail-paced race. Only a stellar mix of stamina, patience, wit, and stubbornness could bring the city administration and Central Park Conservancy (who were extremely critical of any installation because they feared for damage to the park due to the bracings for the gates) to one table that lead to the installation – eventually.
[tttgallery id=”870″]
In the aftermath, “The Gates” was an amazing success for Central Park. No damage was done to anything in the park, amazing public relations were generated worldwide, plus a generous donation to the Park Administration by Christo and Jeanne-Claude made the decision to allow this exception a wise move. It took Christo and Jeanne-Claude 25 years to implement “The Gates” – but this kind of stamina was an essential part of their artistic work. Without their endurance all their ideas would have remained just nice dreams.
“He sees himself as an educated Marxist who knows how to use the capitalist system for his art.”
Finally: Who has paid for all this? Christo and Jeanne-Claude! Through the sale of posters and other merchandise related to their studies for the different projects, they were able to finance their projects without any public or private support from third parties. From Jeanne-Claude’s perspective, their projects became particularly powerful because they were available to everyone, but only temporary and could not be purchased or owned. The New York Times wrote, quoting Christo, that he sees himself as an educated Marxist who knows how to use the capitalist system for his art.
“Certain components of landscape architecture can take inspiration from Christo’s and Jeanne-Claude’s work”
Landscape architecture is no ‘free art’, but certain components of landscape architecture can take inspiration from Christo’s and Jeanne-Claude’s work. Their design always referred to a spatial context; interventions were never only self-reflecting – they always turned into a new meaning for each space that went beyond the transient physical art itself.
Today, when I remember the artworks of Christo and Jeanne-Claude that I personally had the opportunity to witness and experience, it seems to me that they both look at the viewer through their art – with a twinkle in their eyes – saying: Enjoy life and allow yourself to see things differently! Discover the new in the seemingly well-known!
From September 28th to 30th, 2021, the World Congress of Building Greening 2021 will take place in Berlin. The theme will be “Meet the World of Building Greening in Berlin!”. 100 speakers, five series of lectures and a contribution by the world-renowned facade greener Patrick Blanc will attract interested people from all over the world to the German capital.
[tttgallery id=”794″]
Climate change, adaptation strategies, expectations for sustainable construction, rainwater management, preserving biological diversity, funding opportunities, cost-benefit considerations – all these issues will be addressed at the World Congress of Building Greening 2021 in Berlin. From 16 to 18 June, 100 speakers, 40 exhibitors and 20 cooperation partners will come together to impart knowledge on building greening, showcase best practice examples and network.
Sustainability, policy and practical examples
These are the main topics:
- Urban strategies (urban dialogue, subsidies, water and climate sensitive urban development, urban resilience and future city)
- Sustainability (Ecological overall concepts, sustainable urban development and economic efficiency analysis)
- Health (climate adaptation strategies, quality of life, binding of particulate matter and nitrogen oxide)
- Biodiversity (biological diversity, plant selection, species and insect protection)
- Market (data, potential analysis and green roof index)
- Politics (How does green buildings move Germany, Europe and the world)
- Rainwater management (blue-green infrastructure, flood prevention and retention roofs)
- Architectural and practical examples (best practice, industrial and residential construction, high-rise greenery, urban farming)
- Technology (basics, high-tech solutions, innovations and monitoring)
[tttgallery id=”796″]
Programme, location, registration
Organizer of the congress is the Bundesverband GebäudeGrün e.V. (BuGG), flanked by the world and European associations (WGIN and EFB) and the two partner associations from Austria (VfB) and Switzerland (SFG). The exclusive congress partner of the World Congress of Building Greening 2021 is Nürnberg Messe.
The patrons are German Federal Minister Horst Seehofer (Federal Ministry of the Interior, for Construction and Homeland), German Federal Minister Svenja Schulze (Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety) and German Senator Katrin Lompscher (Berlin Senate Department for Urban Development and Housing). The Senate Department for Urban Development and Housing also provides support in the technical and organisational preparation. The World Congress is also supported by the Federal Institute for Research on Building, Urban Affairs and Spatial Development (BBSR).
Details of the event programme, the venue and registration options can be found here.